[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: multiple types

• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:44:51 -0500

Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:

>
> I think people are getting confused between instances and type
> definitions. In the context of a type definition, it makes great
> sense to use "is-a" and "has-a" and "extends", etc. This is
> again, defining the *type*, not an instance.

Are you saying anything different than there is a difference between an XML
document and a schema describing the document?

Examplotron is something that blurs this.

-Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: multiple types
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML informationmodels)
• Next by Date: RE: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models)
• Previous by thread: RE: multiple types
• Next by thread: Re: multiple types (Re: attribute order)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread