[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>, Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:37:39 -0600

So now the guy can go to lunch during the 
downtime and almost make it back.

The trick is failover.  The problem of 
attacking an unrealistic requirement 
with a simple solution is cost:  what 
solution makes it realistic.  Like many 
out of the box solutions, you have 
to redefine the requirement.  No one 
system typically leaves you with one free 
lunch.  Two might.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@m...]

Richard Tobin scripsit:

> 0.01% of a year is 3,000 seconds, not 30.

Oops.  Musta misread the % sign or something.

Ignore previous flames.

Unless somebody promises you 99.9999% reliability, in which case beware.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Relative Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: Relative Namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Next by thread: RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread