[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: advocating XML

  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:00:30 -0500

Re: advocating XML
Paul T wrote -

> ... both Templates and Generators *do*not* imply XSLT ( and XML )

 No argument here.  Actually, I did the work I described in my first post as
an experiment, but I'm pleased with the results.

> Remember Java? Remember these billions wasted into writing
> monsters in Java? Not that I have something against Java, but
> I started to like diversity ... and after the school of XSLT and SAX,
> I now write in RE as if I have XML - *that* really helps ;-)

> I think both are good things but both are
> not a solution 'as-is'.   And both are overhyped, I should say.
Hear, hear!


Tom P


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.