Re: advocating XML
Paul T wrote - > ... both Templates and Generators *do*not* imply XSLT ( and XML ) No argument here. Actually, I did the work I described in my first post as an experiment, but I'm pleased with the results. > > Remember Java? Remember these billions wasted into writing > monsters in Java? Not that I have something against Java, but > I started to like diversity ... and after the school of XSLT and SAX, > I now write in RE as if I have XML - *that* really helps ;-) > > > I think both are good things but both are > not a solution 'as-is'. And both are overhyped, I should say. > Hear, hear! Cheers, Tom P
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format