[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must arguments be path expressions?

• From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 03:27:58 -0800

At 03:13 8-03-2001, james anderson wrote:
>The result of a literal parse of the xpath expression (from WD-xsl-19980818)

Why are you using a draft that's two and a half years old?  I don't even 
remember what 'attribute("ordered")' is supposed to do any more.

Can you repeat your experiment using REC-xpath[1] and REC-xslt[2]?

-Chris

[1] <URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath >
[2] <URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt >
-- 
Christopher R. Maden, XML Consultant
<URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >

• References:
  • an xpath/xsl question: why must arguments be path expressions?
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must arguments be path expressions?
• Next by Date: How Big is XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: an xpath/xsl question: why must (a QName in an) argument be apathexpression?
• Next by thread: How Big is XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread