Re: more grist
At 08:13 AM 3/1/2001 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >I wrote a piece based on the arguments of a couple of weeks ago, but it >still seems to fit the debates as they currently rage here: > >"XML ain't what it used to be" >http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/02/28/eightytwenty.html > >Comments welcome, public or private. I have to confess that I tend to agree with much of what Simon says in his article. Tying future XML specs to XML Schema, given the controversy around it in the developer community, seems like a recipe for disaster. However, tying it to something like the Infoset, and through that, the sort of things you might see in XML Schema, or TREX, or RELAX, might make sense. That way, the implementation is tied to no specific syntax, while maintaining the features that schemas offer. --->Ben
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format