[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)

• From: XML Everywhere <host@x...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:17:36 -0800

Very good comments.  I worry, however, that validation will
become pie in the sky.  DTDs forever (yuk) ...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Brennan" <Michael_Brennan@A...>
To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)


> I'd be happy to contribute to the poll. I'm holding off on that, though,
to
> see if that web-based questionaire is put up (rather than shower the list
> with my response).
>
> I thought I'd respond on a more general note, though. I think a great deal
> of the controversy and differing opinions is due to people using XML in
very
> different ways toward very different ends. In a sense, this is a great
> testament to the flexibility and power of XML. Where we've gone wrong is
> trying to standardize too much. XML Schema presents, I think, an important
> lesson for us to learn. There was too much expectation on the part of too
> many people for a grand unified schema language that would support
> everyone's use case. Those who say the WG should go back to drawing board
> and come up with something that is free of controversy and appeases
everyone
> do not have a firm grasp of reality. That is an unachievable goal. I think
> the WG should have tried to achieve less, but I suspect selling all of the
> participants on that vision would have been a hard sell. Too many parties
> look for a W3C spec to sanction and bless anything they would ever want to
> do with a schema language.
>
> I think the time has come for some of the different sub-communities within
> the XML community to part ways, to some degree. We need to stop looking
for
> those grand unified specs and resign ourselves to diversity. Sometimes the
> fork in the road is a good thing; it means we can get on our way unimpeded
> instead of bickering endlessly about where we should all be headed. We are
> not all trying to go to the same destination.

• References:
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A simple guy with a simple problem
• Next by Date: RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Previous by thread: RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
• Next by thread: Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread