|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: A Call for Dialogue on XML Schema Part 1 and 2
At 01:07 PM 3/12/01 -0500, David E. Cleary wrote: >XML Schema is an integral part of XForms. The purpose of XForms is to come >up with a design that separates Model from UI from Instance. You are not >constrained in a GUI as to what format is displayed. The constraint is >only in the transfer syntax, where it should be. To put it bluntly, is it really clear that using XML Schema as an 'integral part' of any other spec is a good idea at this point? Or would it make more sense for XForms to take an approach like the that of the DOM Level 3 Content Model material, which can work with multiple schema types? (Yes, I know they're very different projects, but some days...) Historically, it looks like XML Schema got piled on at a late date: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xforms-datamodel-20000406 >This sets out a proposal for a data modelling language and expression >syntax for forms. It uses XML Schema for the semantics of the data types, >but re-expresses this in a simple syntax more likely to win the hearts and >minds of typical HTML authors. Interesting language, that. Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








