Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
At 00:10 02/03/2001 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote: >Hmm. What do you think of... >[snip very interesting xbind example] I think it's great ! It's true that RDDL might not be powerful enough to provide all that could be required for an extension, this really would help. <xbind:param name="date" type="string" /> and <xbind:return type="string" /> would need to accept more than just the XPath types in order to work with extension objects (already in the spec). We need a simple way to specify extra types. Do you think something similar could be achieved for extension elements ? -- robin b. "Many people would sooner die than think. In fact, they do." - Bertrand Russell
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format