|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll)
At 12:56 AM 3/16/01 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote: >Perhaps it would be clearer to say that I fear a distraction causing a lack >of participation in guiding the W3C specs in directions we may share, rather >than having much interest in suppressing minimalist's (archeological) desire >for reform per se.) Maybe I'm simply wacked, but I can't say I encourage "participation in guiding the W3C specs in directions we may share" at this point, having found it to be a thankless and rather futile pursuit. I strongly suggest that developers who find W3C specs distasteful develop competing approaches. XArc had a (in my view) beneficial impact on XLink, and I hope RELAX, TREX, and Schematron have a similarly beneficial impact on XML Schemas. Smaller groups (even individuals) may be able to outpace and outperform the W3C's growing committees as well. The W3C does _some_ interesting work. I don't, however, think the institution's later specs should be allowed to rest on the laurels created by a few earlier specs. The value of XML 1.0 seems pretty clear (and I'd suggest is worthy of strict adherence). The rest seems pretty clouded, with occasional moments of sunshine. Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








