[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)

• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:13:28 -0500

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:


> Question for you: Do you ever get a requirement that requires all system
> operations 
> to return in under 3 seconds and the operational reliability to be 99.99% of
> the 
> time 24/7?  Do we?  
> 
> Everyday, everytime, in every proposal.

30 seconds of downtime per year???

Presumably you write in assembly language on the bare metal of mil-spec
hardware, otherwise you are depending on other people's code/gear that is
nowhere near that reliable.
-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Next by Date: RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Previous by thread: RE: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Next by thread: Re: ??? (was RE: A simple guy with a simple problem)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread