[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: DTD Entity

• From: jcowan@r...
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:19:00 -0500 (EST)

Richard Knapp scripsit:

> We are working on DTD with the following requirement:
> 
> - Base element consists of Child elements First, Second, Third, and Fourth.
> - First must appear under Base.
> - Second, Third, and Fourth may appear zero or one time.
> - Order is not important for elements Second, Third, and Fourth.

(First, ((Second, ((Third, Fourth?) | (Fourth, Third?))?) |
        (Third, ((Second, Fourth?) | (Fourth, Second?))?) |
        (Fourth, ((Second, Third?) | (Third, Second?))?)
        )?)

will do what you want.  Yes, it's verbose, and it doubles in length every time
you add a new optional element.  But it works.

That said, you should probably just impose a fixed order, and go with

(First, Second?, Third?, Fourth?)

BTW, Charles Reitzel's straight enumeration *is* non-deterministic,
so it won't work.

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD Entity
• Next by Date: Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD Entity
• Next by thread: Re: DTD Entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread