|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: is that a fork in the road?
Sean McGrath wrote: > In summary, I'm saying three things: > > 1) XML "partical physics" is interesting but engineers shouldn't have > to worry about it in their day jobs. Indeed. Nor will they if the basic piece of XML-handling software, placed at the point where documents are received and prepared for handling by a local process, first parses arriving XML into its well-formed 'particles', breaking them out of the larger structures in which they might have been transmitted, and then instantiates them under local control into the specific datatypes, element hierarchies and larger data structures which the local process expects. > 2) Unlike partical physics, with XML we get to define the basic > building blocks of matter rather than have them foisted upon us by an > external reality. Indeed. And redefine them at either greater or lesser granularity at each node, as the local process there may require (it might sometimes even be a wave- rather than a particle-based process). The effective common form of data is that in which it may be instantiated to be understood and usefully processed by local functionality, without regard to the form or structure in which it was received, or that in which it may be required later by a downstream process. > 3) I believe WF XML would make a great fundamental compound on which > to build. Indeed. What else has the same atomic integrity and yet is so mutable to various very different processes. Respectfully, Walter Perry
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








