[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Best Practice for this problem?

• From: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@b...>
• To: Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:33:57 +0000

I have recently been asked to look at a schema, of which this is a part:

			<xsd:choice>
				<xsd:annotation>
					<xsd:documentation>At least one of Town, County and
Locality</xsd:documentation>
				</xsd:annotation>
				<xsd:choice>
					<xsd:element name="Town" type="bs7666:TownType"/>
					<xsd:element name="Locality" type="bs7666:LocalityType"/>
					<xsd:element name="County" type="bs7666:CountyType"/>
				</xsd:choice>
				<xsd:sequence>
					<xsd:element name="Town" type="bs7666:TownType"/>
					<xsd:element name="Locality" type="bs7666:LocalityType"/>
				</xsd:sequence>
				<xsd:sequence>
					<xsd:element name="Town" type="bs7666:TownType"/>
					<xsd:element name="County" type="bs7666:CountyType"/>
				</xsd:sequence>
				<xsd:sequence>
					<xsd:element name="Locality" type="bs7666:LocalityType"/>
					<xsd:element name="County" type="bs7666:CountyType"/>
				</xsd:sequence>
				<xsd:sequence>
					<xsd:element name="Town" type="bs7666:TownType"/>
					<xsd:element name="Locality" type="bs7666:LocalityType"/>
					<xsd:element name="County" type="bs7666:CountyType"/>
				</xsd:sequence>
			</xsd:choice>

The intention is clear - at least one of the three elements <Town>,
<Locality>, <County>, but each must not appear more than once.

I believe the format to be non-compliant with XML Schema since each of the
three elements has multiple definitions within the same scope. XML Authority
2.1 agrees with me, XML Spy 3.5 does not.

If I am right, there are two choices:

1. Define the three elements globally, then reference them as required. This
loses the benefit of a local definition within the complex data type.

2. Define the elements as at the start of the example:

				<xsd:choice>
					<xsd:element name="Town" type="bs7666:TownType"/>
					<xsd:element name="Locality" type="bs7666:LocalityType"/>
					<xsd:element name="County" type="bs7666:CountyType"/>
				</xsd:choice>

Then access by reference from there. For example:

				<xsd:sequence>
					<xsd:element ref="Town"/>
					<xsd:element ref="Locality"/>
				</xsd:sequence>

I have never seen an example that uses "ref=" pointing to a locally scoped
definition. Is this allowed?

Any thoughts?

Regards

Paul Spencer

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Best Practice for this problem?
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;
• Next by Date: Re: Gag me with a blunt &#x85;
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible small RDDL enhancement
• Next by thread: Re: Best Practice for this problem?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread