[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)

• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:51:53 +0800

>Use of validating parsers

Yes

>Use of namespaces

Yes

>Use of pipeline processing techniques (e.g. xml in, xml out)

Yes

>Use of XPath

Yes

>Use of entity structure

?? Yes I use entities. And CDATA sections.

>Use of internal document type declaration subsets

Yes I use DTD

>Use of notations

No, but I have in the past.

>Use of DOM levels

Not yet.

>Use of SAX1/2

No

>Use of JDOM/Pyxie/etc.

No

>Use of SGML tools e.g. nsgmls

Not currently

>Use of lexical parsing e.g. regular expressions

Yes

>Use of mixed content

Yes

>Use of ID/IDREF

Yes

>etc. etc.

Ditto

>Thoughts?

Do I detect that, despite a year passing since SML managed to divert a lot
of high-quality people's attentions from Schemas, people are still madly
keen to ignore the things they can change and fart around with things they
cannot. It is like seeing an American train bearing down on us at a
train-crossing and thinking that we can stop it by adopting the metric
system.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>
  • RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
• Next by Date: patient info schema
• Previous by thread: RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
• Next by thread: Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread