Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
Richard Lanyon wrote: > > Could someone explain to me why CDATA section start/end markers were > taken out of the W3C Infoset? I don't know the official rationale, but it makes sense: CDATA section boundaries are a lexical artifact, much like the distinction between '"' and ''' in attribute value specifications, whitespace in tags, and entity references, all of which are also omitted from the Infoset. > I was hoping to use the Infoset in writing the spec for XML Script, > but the removal of these markers makes it very difficult to write an > implementation of XML Script which is based around a DOM. [...] > > Is there any chance that CDATA section start/end markers could be put > back in? Probably not, but there's no reason why you can't include CDATA section boundaries in *your* Infoset. The W3C XML Infoset is a lowest common denominator; for XML Script to be "Infoset compliant" it shouldn't throw anything in the W3C infoset out, but it's free to add any new items that are appropriate. That's my understanding anyway. --Joe English jenglish@f...
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format