[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: advocating XML

• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 07:06:06 -0500 (EST)

Danny Ayers scripsit:

> A rather convincing argument against the unix approach could be - my server
> isn't running unix.

Unix by historical origin, but not by current applicability.  Perl runs on
all major environments, and so do the various GNU tools.

> However, I do have an seriously versatile toolbox in the form of Java and I
> don't need another skill set for this application or virtually any other you
> care to mention. 

Sure.  There are *lots* of portable platforms these days.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • RE: advocating XML
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
• Next by Date: Re: SyncML is kind of interesting
• Previous by thread: RE: advocating XML
• Next by thread: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread