[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: more grist

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 14:13:51 -0600

I see that.  The issue was raised of 
using it to make XML syntax-independent. 
I don't see that although I understand it.

And I am mentioning you prominently 
in my prayers tonight along with the 
Caucasian lady I saw at Pizza Inn with three 
children, two asian girls and one black toddler, 
all calling her "mama".  God bless those 
that take it on themselves to hold 
together diversity.  Such is the sweet 
spot of understanding.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Cc: Ben Trafford; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: more grist


Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> So the InfoSet takes the role of the 
> SGML Declaration sort of (not tied 
> to a specific syntax)?

The Infoset is a property set, less
comprehensive than the SGML property set.

• Prev by Date: RE: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
• Next by Date: RE: Homework assignment was: Re: more grist
• Previous by thread: RE: more grist
• Next by thread: RE: more grist
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread