|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
"Henry S. Thompson" wrote: > It's also true, in my opinion and > that of many in the community, that XML Schema as it stands will be an > incredibly valuable move forward: not perfect, but the right first > step. I'm looking forward to seeing it deployed, to using it, and to > working to integrate all we've learned from the experience and from > external input as we move on to start work on the next version. It is clear to me XML Schema as it stands *is* useful. However, it's also clear to me that there is the potential to create a schema language (or perhaps family of languages) for XML that is significantly better that XML Schema as it stands and that satisfies the requirements placed on XML Schema. I am content to have XML Schema as it stands now, so long as that doesn't prevent the XML community getting something better in the future. In particular, I hope that: (a) overly tight coupling between other W3C specs and XML Schema 1.0 will be avoided (b) future versions of XML Schema will not be constrained to be 100% compatible with XML Schema 1.0; the requirement for any future version should be that it be possible automatically to translate XML Schema 1.0 into that future version This will allow the potential for the creation of a better schema language to be realized to the maximum extent possible in future versions of XML Schema. James
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








