[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail

• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 10:02:45 +1100

At 04:31 1/03/2001, Tim Bray wrote:

>At 12:07 PM 28/02/01 +1100, James Robertson wrote:
> >But when the difficult questions arise,
> >the W3C invariably says "hey don't blame
> >us, we're not creating standards!".
>
>Uh, when?  I haven't observed this. -T

Namespaces.

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why not reinvent the wheel?
• Next by Date: Re: Is whitespace within general entities ignorable?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Next by thread: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread