[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Open Source XML Editor

  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
  • To: Michael Smith <smith@x...>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:05:10 +0000 (GMT)

openoffice xml editor
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Michael Smith wrote:

> Regarding a key point you make in the article:
> 
>   What XML geeks really want to see is a free WYSIWYG XML editor like
>   XMetaL or Adept. And here it is. If we restrict ourselves (or our
>   customers) to using defined styles, OpenOffice can truly be a
>   structured XML editor, without ever knowing you are editing XML.
> 
> Isn't the main value of a structured or so-called "validating" editor
> like XMetaL or Adept/Epic (or Emacs/PSGML, or a WYSIWYG editor like
> Morphon or epcEdit) that it enables validated editing against any
> _arbitrary_ DTD you plug into it, and gives you clear, direct access
> to the structural and semantic richness/complexity of that DTD?
> 
> That is, what I think most people have in mind when they hear the
> phrase "structured XML editor" is an editor that constrains document
> authors to all rules of whatever DTD they want to author with --
> including restrictions on element order, on attribute values, and so
> on -- not just that it constrains them to a certain set of elements.

I guess I'm looking at it from an unusual perspective, and to that end,
maybe "structured XML editor" was the wrong term to use.

Just to kick off, I will say that OpenOffice *does* offer ways to guide
you what "tags" are valid at a particular point in your document. It does
this by defining style hierarchies. I'm not 100% sure if this is flexible
enough, but its a start for what you're after.

But the way I see it personally is that OpenOffice allows you to edit
arbitrary XML structures by modifying the *stylesheet* you apply to the
core OpenOffice XML format. So for example, I have stylesheets (and
accompanying OpenOffice templates) that allow you to generate either
DocBook or HTML directly. Other XML dialects are easy enough to add.

I'm not arguing with you though - I agree with what you're saying - its
not *exactly* what XMetaL or Adept give us. And it probably never will
be. But for many of us it hits that "good enough" spot, and in fact is
probably at a more intuitive level of usability than those other tools.

As usual, its a case of "right tool for the job". OpenOffice probably
isn't a good tool for authoring aircraft manuals, but it rocks for doing
technical documents to display on the web (note that the article in
question was authored using this technique).

-- 
<Matt/>

    /||    ** Director and CTO **  **    http://axkit.com/    **
   //||    **  AxKit.com Ltd   **  ** XML Application Serving **
  // ||    ** http://axkit.org **  ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP  **
 // \\| // 
     \\//
     //\\
    //  \\



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.