[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XPointer and the '729 patent

• From: David LeBlanc <whisper@o...>
• To: "Steven J. DeRose" <Steven_DeRose@b...>,"Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:45:04 -0800

I wonder if even the PTO would be indifferent to a bunch of 3rd party
ammendments to the original filing, particularly if they show prior art?

AFAIK, anyone can ammend a patent at any time - i've heard it's the first
step in fighting a patent even.

Dave LeBlanc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven J. DeRose [mailto:Steven_DeRose@b...]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 9:47 AM
> To: Eve L. Maler; xml-dev@l...
> Cc: 729-patent@e...; Janet Daly; patent-issues@w...
> Subject: Re: XPointer and the '729 patent
>
>
> I wish to echo Claude's point that a re-examination, if done, should
> be done in a scrupulously open fashion.
>
> If I understand the "normal" PTO re-examination procedure correctly
> (<dcl>I am not a lawyer</dcl>), it involves only representatives of
> the PTO and of the patent holder. This seems an obviously partial
> procedure, since the PTO has an interest in supporting its own prior
> decisions, and the patent holder has an interest in maintaining its
> patent's validity.
>
> This problem is compounded by the fact that such a re-examination
> lends a (potentially spurious) sense of strengthened validity that
> could adversely affect any later evaluations.
>
> So, I suggest the following:
>
> Either Sun do a simple "dedication to public domain" as someone
> suggested (this would surely be cheaper than spending another couple
> hours' of Sun attorneys' time),
>
> or ensure that a re-examination be, as Clause suggested, include a
> significant set of neutral third party experts. Surely several such
> can be found on this list; assuming people consider me reasonably
> neutral, I would be willing to help without fee (so long as the time
> didn't get excessive).
> --
> Steven_DeRose@B...; http://www.stg.brown.edu/~sjd
> Chief Scientist, Brown Univ. Scholarly Technology Group
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
>

• References:
  • Re: XPointer and the '729 patent
    • From: "Steven J. DeRose" <Steven_DeRose@b...>

• Prev by Date: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Next by Date: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Previous by thread: Re: XPointer and the '729 patent
• Next by thread: RE: XPointer and the '729 patent
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread