|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Data Model(s) for XML 1.0 / XML Devcon / DOM / XSL / Query
>Sean McGrath wrote: > > > isn't it time to accept that not specifying formal > > post-parse data model(s) for XML 1.0 was a big > > mistake? At 12:18 PM 2/23/01 -0500, W. E. Perry wrote: >In a word, no. Those post-parse plus post-additional-processing data >models are in effect being specified now by, among others, the very >groups whose work you cite here. Ah yes, but the after-the-fact, bifurcated struggle to hone in on post-parse data models has resulted in nasty impedance mismatches between some key, horizontal XML technologies that should be living in harmony but are not. There is no one true data model that covers the range of XML based applications from editing to rendering (except perhaps groves but lets not go there...) Having said that, there is, it seems to me, a clear and useful divide between a read only data model and a read/write data model for well formed XML. I would like to see something like this emerge to form an abstract base class for infosets rather than the Bag data structure infoset we currently have. regards,
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








