[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: intertwined specs

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:24:07 -0600

No.  I'd be unnerved if that weren't happening. 
It would mean the specs are incantations for 
magical events.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

...now we 
seem to moving toward a jungle of intertwined specs, with complexity 
increasing despite/because of reuse.

Anyone else find this unnerving?

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: intertwined specs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: intertwined specs
• Next by Date: OASIS TC call for participation: TREX
• Previous by thread: RE: Why Model Concepts? (Was RE: Object Role Modelling (ORM) or U MLor ??for designing Schemas)
• Next by thread: RE: intertwined specs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread