|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
> If you're using RELAX for validation, it doesn't have any ambiguity
> issues. In this regard it is the same as TREX. The ambiguity issues
> only arise if you try to use it to "interpret" the document (that is
> augment the information in the document by assigning each element or
> attribute a label corresponding to some rule in the schema). If you
> just stick to validation, there's no issue.
You're right. And I read your tutorial that states
> The role of TREX is ... not to assist in interpretation of the
> documents belonging to the class
(1) I think "assistance of the interpretation" is important requirement
of schema language (or at least I think there are solid needs).
But it seems to me that you don't share this view, do you. Why?
(2) If we set aside ambiguity issue, it is easy to add "assistance"
capability to TREX, by (for example) introducing "type" attribute to
each <element> and <attribute> element in the pattern.
Do you have any reason to discourage this?
regards,
----------------------
K.Kawaguchi
E-Mail: k-kawa@b...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








