[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Plan A + Plan B = Plan C?

• From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 15:06:12 +0000

I thought I'd meld Jonathan and Tim's proposals together somewhat, 
and I came up with:-

     XNCL - http://infomesh.net/xncl/

I'm not great with names, so I just came up with what I thought it was:
"XML Namespace Catalogue Language". It uses empty <div> elements in the
Link elements to avoid overloading them, and to allow for family
derivations. The good this is that it actualy uses proper XHTML m12n
(except I haven't written the DTD yet, but when I do you can be sure it'll
conform more or less to http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization !)

It's not a full description, you can imagine the rest.

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

• Prev by Date: Re: XNRL
• Next by Date: Re: XNRL
• Previous by thread: RE: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
• Next by thread: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread