|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Eugene Kuznetsov wrote:
> > I recall one of the presenters at XTech last year had been
> > experimenting with using a Java-serialized DOM rather than the source
> > XML document, and was surprised to find that the Java-serialized DOM
> > was both considerably larger than the *uncompressed* XML and
> > considerably slower to load.
>
> That shouldn't be surprising -- generally speaking a parse tree is
> larger than the text input to the parser. (And java serialization
> doesn't win any awards for efficiency in either time or space).
>
> However, a binary representation of the same data (specified in
> ASN.1 and encoded using BER, say) would be much smaller and more
> efficient.
Stefano Mazzocchi of Apache Cocoon project fame (now left that project)
has developed a binary serialization of SAX that is significantly faster
to load than the original XML (than Xerces non-validating mode).
I think he did some further work on it to make the binary format
smaller...
http://mailman.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/002689.html
(warning that page contains the compiler/decompiler itself as a Base64
attachment)
But then this is getting off-topic...
--
<Matt/>
/|| ** Director and CTO **
//|| ** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
// || ** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
// \\| // ** Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/ **
\\//
//\\
// \\
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








