[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RDDL API

• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:04:08 -0500

Michael Brennan wrote:
>
>
> What about having the "getResource" return a javax.activation.DataSource
> object rather than an InputStream? That way the content-type can
> be conveyed
> if it is defined in the catalog.
>

	That would be good, though to maximize portability e.g. JDK 1.1 etc, would
it be better to do:

	URLConnection getConnection(String namespaceURI,String arcrole);

Alternatively define a Resource class:

package org.rddl;

interface Resource {
	String getURI();
	String getHref();
	String getArcrole();
	String getRole();
	String getContentType();
	InputStream getInputStream();
	URLConnection getConnection();
}
class RDDLFilter extends SAX2Filter {
	Resource getResource(String arcroleURI);
	void parse(String namespaceURI);
};

-Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: RDDL API
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>

• Prev by Date: [Zvon] Zvon Character Reference
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML m12n XSD
• Previous by thread: RE: RDDL API
• Next by thread: RE: RDDL API
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread