[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgramm

• From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@h...>
• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:24:58 -0700

Any hint on how to provide feedback?  For example, the BSR schema attempts to use illegal names such as "2.310" and "2.310.330.656" for element and type names and a lot of the type attributes on
element definitions do not have an explicit namespace prefix resulting in trying to find a "656" type in the schema for schemas, for example.

Doesn't seem quite ready for primetime.

• Prev by Date: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
• Next by Date: Re : Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguit ydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
• Previous by thread: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
• Next by thread: RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread