[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names andwell k

• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@x...
• Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:18:01 -0500

John Cowan wrote:


> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Jason Diamond wrote:
>
>
>  > If a type isn't serialized as XML and so doesn't have a namespace URI
or
>  > something that we could all reasonably agree upon, then somebody needs
to
>  > make one up for it. How about
> http://www.rddl.org/mime/application/zip, for
>  > example? Or, better, urn:Content-Type:application/zip. I don't really
> care
>  > what the specific URI is as long as it's documented and we all use
> the same
>  > one.
>
>   I suggest
> http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/text
>   which is the official home of the official registration of
> application/zip.
>
perfect, it resolves to a nice text/plain description which in the the case
of application/xml is RFC 2376.
this will be a big help to reorganize the examples in arcrole.htm/role.htm

-Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: More SIX
• Next by Date: RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Previous by thread: RE: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names
• Next by thread: More SIX
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread