[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 10:57:00 -0600

Thanks!   Did they put a condensed version 
on the web?  I am losing the battle with the 
information firehose these days.

One might note that such encounters and strategies 
can be classified as "creative" and "non-creative" 
encounters.  The former not only allow ambiguity, 
they embrace it.  That is why I see mostly fixed 
price work.  

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill dehOra [mailto:BdehOra@i...]

Today must be citation day :) Rosenschein and Zlotkin's book, "Rules of
Encounter" is good stuff and all about applying game theoretics to machine
negotiations. 

-Bill

• Prev by Date: RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
• Next by Date: Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
• Previous by thread: RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
• Next by thread: RE: Medieval Metadata (was RE: Namespace Basic Principles)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread