[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:21:18 -0800

At 05:34 PM 11/01/01 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>  I will just note that exhibiting prior art is not sufficient.
>You also need some legal action to take place before getting a
>patent removed, right ? (I would be soooo happy if I was wrong !)

If the patent holder chooses to defend it, typical legal costs to 
get one stricken down are about a million dollars. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Fighting Software Patents
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Next by Date: XPointer and Sun patent
• Previous by thread: Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Next by thread: Fighting Software Patents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread