[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson), Jason Diamond <jason@i...>
• Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:22:44 -0800

At 10:20 AM 09/01/01 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>I strongly agree with Jason's analysis here.  I certainly want _some_
>attribute of rddl:resource to _always_ be
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema if what's pointed to is in fact an
>XML Schema!

Hrumph.  I think Henry's right.  Maybe my minimalism was a bit too 
brutal?

So, maybe

 role= required canonical name for what kind type of thing it is, like 
       Henry says; we still provide a list of them in rddl.org/roles.html 

 arcrole= optional user-provided selector, also a URI, RDDL doesn't
          provide any help here.

Anyone have a better idea? -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: Jason Diamond <jason@i...>
  • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: Jason Diamond <jason@i...>
  • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Next by Date: RE: What is happened with Balise?
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Next by thread: RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread