|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
I think that Rick and I are approachng the same question for somewhat different reasons. Let me lay out my dislike for the extension to XHTML quickly: 1) Is XHTML the right format to extend (I think the answer is probably yes, but I call into question the recent threads over the future of XHTML on XHTML-L@e...) 2) If I were developing a small XML based product that needed to be validated-- and was forced to include references to the XHTML namespace (and therefore much larger DTDs) only so that it would be human readable (which is generally needed but not always) it would definitely be the bottleneck in the validation process-- as the XHTML namespace would now presumably be deref'd. That being said, I feel as though everyone has made their case well (who could resist Len's monkey argument <grin/>) and so I this point I am ready to concede as I am not satisfied with the status quo and feel that RDDL is in general an excellent solution to the *riddle* of namespaces. My only hope would be that someday in the future there would be a lightweight RDDL and then one wrapped in XHTML for those who require human readable documentation. Thanks for all of the patience, Jeff Rafter Defined Systems
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








