|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Resource gloss
> I like XML Namespace Gloss. XNGloss, or whatever. > > > I hope Jonathan, Tim and Sean would have a few > > spare cycles left as well > > You bet I have. I look forward to seeing this through 'till the time it > ends up as a W3C Recommendation :-) > Seriously, I think having <link><resource/></link> in a m12n family is the > best way to go... and the details aren't all that hard to sort out: this > thing kind of writes itself. Yes, I'm not saying this would be a titanic undertaking, but I do think it needs a home and an authority. Probably not W3C. First of all, Paul Grosso mentioned that this is an area where the W3C had thought maybe the community could do some work. Secondly, it's probably too lightweight for the W3C. More a SAX than a DOM (REC) or SOAP (NOTE). Thirdly, I think the Resource Gloss extensions to XHTML themselves should have an "http://xml.org/..." namespace. And, hey, this is one case where no one could call foul about the use of HTTP URI in an "official" NSRef. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@f... +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








