[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: ResourceDirectoryDesc

• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 13:38:10 -0500

Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
>
> > Presumably an XHTML XSD won't have these issues, and <plead>perhaps if a
> > draft XHTML XSD were available we could add it to RDDL's own directory
> > </plead> ... the one I created was exported from XML Authority which
just
> > can't handle the namespaceing mechanisms nor prefixed elements... sigh.
>
> This is not really what Jonathan is requesting, but it is related.
>
> ...a possible
> approach to XHTML Modularization using XML  Schemas  at
> http://www.ascc.net/~ricko/xhtml.html
>

    That's a terrific analysis and IMHO should be required reading for
anyone interested in the pros and cons of using DTDs vs XSD in fairly
complex situations. ... of course what I really wanted for you to complete
this as a working XHTML XSD :-)

-Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
  • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: Resource DirectoryDescription Language (RDDL))
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
• Next by Date: matching
• Previous by thread: Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: Resource DirectoryDescription Language (RDDL))
• Next by thread: Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread