|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: simple question on namespaces.
At 08:56 PM 27/12/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >Uh, well, because inventing something new (or setting explicit limits) >would have spared us the serious confusions, still not resolved, over what >URIs 'mean' when used as namespace identifiers. Same benefits, but perhaps >fewer costs. <rant subject="namespace kvetching" frequency="every 6 months or so"> All attempts to assign meaning to namespace names (which are URI references) are ex post facto and irrelevant to the aims of the namespace recommendation, which is to make names unique for practical purposes in the Internet context. This is a useful thing to do, and the namespace recommendation does it. Once there is some general agreement as to what kinds of semantics one might expect to attach to namespaces, and what mechanisms prove to be the best for expressing those semantics, then it will be possible to have a useful debate about the meaning of namespace identifiers. In the advance of such agreement, the debate has been, and continues to be, an outpouring of hot air which could be put to better use this winter in helping alleviate energy shortages. </rant> -T
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








