Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RDF? TM? (was Re: Didier's lab report)
 Hi Uche Uche said: I just hope you're not mistaking me for anyone in the W3C. I'm just a lowly developer as you are. Didier replies: I know who you are Uche, I am not a newbe to the XML-Dev world you know ;-) My comment was more a comment or a statement that we poor XML developers depends on the gods (W3C) since they write the recommendation and the XML developers follow the rule to respect these recommendations. Uche said: I agree that some aspects of RDF's heavy reliance on namespaces can be a weakness. But I want to point out that although the solution does impair readability, I think it's still a valid solution. Besides, if you don't mind one level of additional processing, it's quite easy to embed the rules about the non-differentiated properties into an attendant stylesheet. In fact, the product I work on, 4Suite Server, provides a mechanism for establishing RDF metadata from arbitrary XML using rules encoded with XPath. Didier replies: Interesting Uche, let us know when you'll have completed this new tool. I take a look at it with a lot of interests. Cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@n... Conferences: xml devcon 2000 (http://www.xmldevcon2000.com) Wireless Summit NY (http:www.pulver.com) xml devcon 2001 London (http://www.xmldevcon2000.com) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: xml.com (http://www.xml.com) 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
