|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Begging the Question
At 08:29 PM 29/12/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >The spec does say something - it does exist. > >Unfortunately, it serves far more as a point of contention than a point of >authority. As one of its authors, I expect you'd disagree with that, but >on flat logic, you've missed my point. Wrong. The spec serves primarily as a guide to implementing software. A huge amount of software has been implemented which conforms to the namespace spec, including substantially all production-quality XML-centric software anywhere in the world. This substantiates the claim that Andrew and I are making: that the namespace spec does what it sets out to do. >The spec's problems do not lie in mere misunderstandings. They lie in the >specification itself and what it attempts to do - and I'd suggest they also >lie in similar problems inherited from RFC 2396. The problems you are (and many others) have pointed out repeatedly is that there are large unresolved problems about sharing semantics and schemas and other related resources, which are highlighted but not solved by XML namespaces. I (and I suspect everyone else who helped build the spec) agree that these are important and serious problems. I see no inconsistency between this position and the position that the spec does what it says it does, especially considering the evidence of its widespread implementation. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








