[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for theWebandSemanticWe

• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:36:33 -0800

Just something to think about..

You may have found a bug in RDF. If it can't be represented in common
programming and scripting environments it's going to have a pretty high
barrier to adoption.

The serialization formats in XML-RPC and SOAP have been proven to work
across many different environments.

Surely you can model a directed graph in a Java or Perl structure?

If so, then you can use XML-RPC or SOAP serialization.

If not, what's the future of RDF??

Dave



----- Original Message -----
From: "Uche Ogbuji" <uche.ogbuji@f...>
To: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
Cc: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the
WebandSemanticWeb)


> > If that's what RDF is going to be used for I'd strongly recommend using
the
> > serialization format in XML-RPC or SOAP. They both work incredibly well,
and
> > are supported in lots of environments and are understandable, very
simple
> > stuff that allows data structures to be exchanged between apps on all
> > platforms. Something to think about? Dave
>
> Say what?
>
> RDF is a directed graph.  There is _nothing_ to compare between RDF and
> foo serialization format.  RDF could be serialized to foo serialization
> format or foo serialization format could maybe represented by an RDF
model,
> but they are orthogonal technologies.
>
> How on earth is SOAP serialization going to represent annotated
> relationships?  You're not seriously suggesting that nonsense with
> multi-reference values, are you?  Even that is more than XML-RPC has to
> offer for relationships.
>
>
> --
> Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
> uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
> Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com
> 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
> Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
>

• References:
  • Re: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the WebandSemanticWeb)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
• Next by Date: RE: local, global (was various ontology, RDF, topic maps)
• Previous by thread: Re: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the WebandSemanticWeb)
• Next by thread: RE: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the WebandSemanticWeb)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread