[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Ontologies

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:05:39 -0800

At 02:01 PM 19/12/00 -0500, W. E. Perry wrote:
>In fact, aren't we ready to go the whole
>way and acknowledge that the ontologies addressable at the nodes of a semantic
>web must in fact *be* executable against the various inputs we put to them? 

What does that mean?  

I suspect I disagree, but the proposition as
stated has too many potential interpretations. -Tim

• References:
  • Re: Schemata are not just constraints [was: "RDF + Topic Maps" = TheFuture]
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Schemata are not just constraints [was: "RDF + Topic Maps" = TheFuture]
    • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@s...>
  • Ontologies, was Re: Schemata are not just constraints
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Ontologies
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Schema Question: decimal including INF??
• Next by Date: RE: Ontologies
• Previous by thread: Re: Ontologies
• Next by thread: Re: Ontologies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread