[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Thats me with my paranoya. Really - the last one. Re: BeggingtheQues

• From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 13:56:35 -0800

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>


> At 10:32 AM 30/12/00 -0700, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> >I'd like something a bit different (but with the same effect).  I agree
> >with Tim Bray that it would be nice to have only human-readable
> >descriptions at the resources resolved by the URI.  
> 
> Nope.  I want human-readable material *plus* links to related
> resources (schemas, etc), these links having associated metadata
> to facilitate automated processing. -Tim

This is also fine with me. In fact I'm fighting for just one more 
sentence in the Namespaces Rec :

"Any usage of URI for gathering actual resources from the web 
not blessed by yet-to-be-written W3C rec is a violation of 
the W3C Namespace Recommendation" or something like that.

I'm not a lawyer.  I just don't like the 'neutral' wording of current 
W3C spec.

Rgds.Paul.

• References:
  • Re: Thats me with my paranoya. Really - the last one. Re: Begging theQuestion
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Tool X horror scenario (was RE: Begging the Question (the novel)
• Next by Date: Re: Begging the Question (the novel)
• Previous by thread: Re: Thats me with my paranoya. Really - the last one. Re: Begging theQuestion
• Next by thread: Namespace usage example
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread