[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 12:43:45 -0500 (EST)

Michael Fitzgerald writes:

 > What do you exactly mean by "the SOAP spec mixes protocol and format"?

It defines two things mixed together -- a data-serialization format,
and a protocol for exchaning that information.  By comparison, note
how important it is that HTML and HTTP are specified separately
(people ended up using HTTP for a lot more than just HTML, and ended
up using HTML in many non-HTTP environments).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
    • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>

• References:
  • RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
    • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace Definitions: Cracks!
• Next by Date: RE: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the WebandSemanticWeb)
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Next by thread: RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread