RE: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
Paul Tchistopolskii wrote, > The sad part is that I think Google is good not because it > works together with <meta>. I think Google is good because it > *kills* the <meta>-based stuff. Google is utilizing many > technologies ( see  and  ). Unfortunately, I think all > of those technologies are almost orthogonal to markup. [snip: Goggle using (co)citation] Why is this sad? Citation and co-citation work because links are semantically rich (ie. they reflect the intentions of human authors surprisingly well *without* needing complex domain modelling) and don't require much cleverness on the part of search engines. That's surely a win ... unless you think that AI is The Only Way. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin InterX Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@i... http://www.interx.com/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format