[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: URNs as SYSTEM IDs

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:16:39 -0600

Disproved how and where?  Conflating name 
and address is a system convenience.

Umm.  A semantic convenience.  
Can you separate system and semantic?  

Calling all cunning linguists...

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

The notion that there's a clean dividing line between addresses
and names has been disproved over and over.   But to the extent
you can separate the naming and addressing functions, it seems
that you win. -Tim

• Prev by Date: Re: URNs as SYSTEM IDs
• Next by Date: RE: Comparison of URIs: Character encoding.
• Previous by thread: RE: URNs as SYSTEM IDs
• Next by thread: XSLT RDF Extractor for XHTML Files
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread