[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.

• From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@y...>
• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:18:51 -0800 (PST)

> implementors posting on the SOAP discussion list often
> raised "issues" and proposed "solutions" for those issues blissfully 
> ignorant of the fact that these issues had already been solved by 
> available XML technologies. One that kept surfacing, for instance, 
> was various proposals for how to encode Unicode characters in a SOAP
> message (which became a particularly important issue since the "XML"
> implementations of the SOAP libraries did not deal with
> character encoding issues properly

And the operational test to distinguish between this and "innovation"
in the "embrace and extend" sense would be?

Just joking! Really, just a little light humor!

S.

=====
<!-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life."
     - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations -->

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/

• Prev by Date: OFFTOPIC: Making Outlook mailing list friendly (was RE: Subsettin g/Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
• Next by Date: Fwd: Announcement: DOM Level 2 Becomes a W3C Recommendation
• Previous by thread: RE: Subsetting/ Canonical Parsers/ XML Compliance/ etc.
• Next by thread: ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 3.5 Beta 1 available for download
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread