[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Doing it the other way around (Re: transformations)

• From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:30:20 +0000 (GMT)

On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Alexey Gokhberg wrote:

> Most of pure XSLT problems can be solved by embedding XSLT into a
> powerful scripting engine (e.g., ECMAScript/JavaScript), and by adding
> XSLT extensions designed to call scripts from XSLT stylesheets.

Well, yes, possibly, but surely there should be a nicer way to do
things than a hybrid of several different programming languages. A
"pure" XSLT problem really shouldn't require a chimera
XSLT/ECMAScript/extension solution.

-- 
Richard Lanyon (Software Engineer) |     "The medium is the message"
XML Script development,            |             - Marshall McLuhan
DecisionSoft Ltd.                  |

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Doing it the other way around (Re: transformations)
    • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@b...>

• References:
  • Re: Doing it the other way around (Re: transformations)
    • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Doing it the other way around (Re: transformations)
• Next by Date: Re: transformations
• Previous by thread: Re: Doing it the other way around (Re: transformations)
• Next by thread: Re: Doing it the other way around (Re: transformations)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread