Richard Lanyon wrote: > ... It's difficult to know what is missing, > unless someone is seriously advocating that XSLT ought to act on the > post-schema-validation infoset (which would seem a bit odd, as you're > just about to change the document, presumably to comply with a > different schema, in which case you're going to have to > schema-validate all over). Would it really be that odd? Wouldn't it be reasonable to validate the input XML against the schema that you assumed in writing the transformation, including using defaulted values added to the post-schema-validation infoset? (If effective attribute values were meant to be transformed, wouldn't it be reasonable to want to process schema-provided values as well as explicitly-given values?) Daniel -- Daniel Barclay Digital Focus Daniel.Barclay@d...
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format