[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:30:19 -0500 (EST)

Simon St.Laurent writes:

 > Sounds like it was a very good thing that the SGML Editorial Review Board
 > transmogrified into the XML Working Group, or we might have people
 > complaining that XML itself commits these very crimes against SGML.

Exactly -- that's why the new name was so important.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• References:
  • Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
    • From: Mike.Champion@S...
  • Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Dangers of De Facto (WAS RE: Dangers of Subsetting?)
• Next by Date: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
• Next by thread: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread