[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)

  • From: Mike.Champion@S...
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:54:56 -0500

perl pullparser
Title: RE: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)

    -----Original Message-----
    From:   Rick JELLIFFE [SMTP:ricko@g...]
    Sent:   Friday, November 10, 2000 3:40 PM
    To:     xml-dev@l...
    Subject:        Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)

      No-one has said Common XML (as a data format) is dangerous.
      I said that developers should boycott parsers that call themselves
      XML but only implement a subset except for specific-purpose systems:
      so you it is fine to make a subset parser (e.g. for SOAP) and
      say "this is a parser for a subset of XML" but it is not fine to
      say "this is an XML parser".

    This makes perfect sense to me.  I'm sorry if I misunderstood the original "boycott" post (I guess I thought it was clear that kXML just claimed to implement "Common XML", but let's not reopen old wounds).

     And thanks for the explanation of ISO 8859 Annex K -- I guess if anyone gets really serious about promoting  "Common XML Core" or "MinML", it would make sense to define it in the official Annex K manner first.

    One issue that generated a lot of traffic on this list a year ago was whether XML needed a similar mechanism with which one could define a "profile" (as Len Bullard used the term it in http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200011/msg00176.html) that constrained the types of markup to be used in a class of  XML applications (e.g., "no PIs, notations, parsed entities or CDATA sections, please" - perhaps if the format needs to be "Desperate Perl Hacker Friendly"). Isn't this more or less what Annex K allows? Would the people who so vigorously oppose defining "subsets of XML" in the name of interoperability be averse to adding a mechanism like this in a future version of XML? 


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.