[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realistic propo

  • From: uche.ogbuji@f...
  • To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:05:57 -0600 (MDT)

semantic web realistic approach
> BTW, if by semantic web they mean 

Egads!  I hope you don't mean the slightest implication that I speak
the W3C's words.  Look, I don't understand half what TBL says, and except for
occasional lapses, I avoid the term "semantic web" because I'm not quite
clear of what it, er, means.

It looks as if I picked an opportune time to finally catch up with
XML-DEV.

> "RDF is the key to a proven design pattern, in which we build portal and
> intranet-type Web applications by marshalling numerous XML snippets. It
> helps us build multi-dimensional structures of object relationships,
which
> are usually cumbersome and unmanageable using traditional database
designs."
> - Uche Ogbuji 

It will be instructive to the rest of the discussion to note that I
restrict my claims to "portals and intranet-type applications".  Note that
these are closed systems.  I shall defend my claim in that space.  If you
wish to migrate the discussion to the open Web, prepare to drop me off
because I don't claim to pack that long a water-stick.

> per the XML.COM article, then this inference engine approach 
> could be compared to OLAP systems.   I am not sure what the 
> inference engine approach buys us that walking a recordset 
> and comparing values to determine actions doesn't.

OLAP, Decision Support, Executive Info Systems: all code-words for taking
the (admittedly old and hoary) ideas of AI and trying to make it work
for the ludicrously structured world of relational databases.  Note
that I say "AI".  I'm not afraid to name names.  I, too am a reformed
"machine intelligence" bigot, and I know that there is not much of the
"I" to be had from "AI".  But like it or not, AI in its maturity really
stands for knowledge-representation and frame-based systems.  Hardly
intelligence, as many people here have pointed out, but quite effective
stuff when it doesn't over-promise.

> Full 
> multi-dimensional (cubes) and query systems are already supported 
> on internet dbs such as SQLServer2000.

Whatever.  Relational databases couldn't find another dimension if they
were made of super-strings.  Uh oh.  Here comes Ken North with a
Shillelagh: better practice my drunken style.

Seriously.  The market triumph of RDBMS is nothing more than a grafting of
astounding hubris on the really quite modest work of Codd and co.  You
can't impose a priori structure on even a subset of the real world, and,
you certainly can't impose a priori structure on business.  Period.

As another poster here mentioned, the semi-structured folk have been
howling this for years.  I'm arguing that they are right.  I'm also
arguing that RDF (warts and all) is probably the most market-viable means
of restoring balance now.  I do hope something better comes along, but in
the meantime, I as a consultant have been solving real business problems
with RDF.

> Enlightenment?  Multiple means exist.  Why use one or the 
> other particularly if one is still considered a failed 
> technology, eg, AI, Prolog, etc.  Yes, that is something 
> to compare to markup because one re-emerged and the other 
> hasn't quite.  Why? 

AI is a failed technology like Gerald Manley Hopkins was a failed
poet.  Nuff aid.

Hopefully someone will come up with a recognized name that drops both the
"A" and the "I", but until then, "AI" is an acceptable name for a
technology that has made and continues to make important contributions to
modern data processing.

And oh by the way, all "Object Oriented Development" ever did was kidnap
frame-based representation and shove it into a straightjacket.  With all
the money that ended up flushed down the OO sink, we probably _could_ have
had computer systems of something that might be called "intelligence".  I
don't claim any insight as to whether this would have provided any
benefit to businesses.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.